Introduction to Bioinformatics and Computational Genomics
Week 10Transcriptomics and differential expression
From a count table to a list of genes that changed, and the three sources of noise that stop you believing the first answer.
Questions this week answers
- When do you normalise for gene length, and when is doing so a mistake?
- The treatment did nothing at all. How many of your 10,000 genes still come out significant?
- The gene with the biggest fold change is at the top of your table. Is it your result?
By the end of this week you can
- Name the three sources of variation in RNA-seq counts
- Say when to normalise for library size and when for gene length, and when not to
- Explain why 10,000 tests at p < 0.05 need correcting
- Read a log2 fold change and an MA plot
0 of 5 done
Why a p value of 0.05 is not a promise
Set the treatment to have no effect at all, then raise the gene count. Every bar that appears is a gene you would have written up.
Nothing changed, and you would still publish 100 genes. That is not a subtle statistical caveat; it is most of a results section.
Genes you would report1000 real, 100 noiseFalse positives100from 2,000 genes that did not changeShare of your list that is real0.0%Threshold per test0.0500A bacterial genome is a few thousand; a human transcriptome is tens of thousands.The p value below which you would call a gene significant.Assumed to be detected every time, which is generous.CorrectionThings to try0 of 3The 10,000-gene example is from the week 10 DGE statistics lecture.
What should survive this week
- Three sources of variation: technical, shot noise, and biological. Biological dominates, and it is why counts follow a negative binomial rather than a Poisson.
- Normalise for library size always. Normalise for gene length only when comparing different genes; for differential expression the length cancels.
- 0.05 x 10,000 = 500 significant genes from a treatment with no effect. This is why an adjusted p column exists.
- log2 makes fold change symmetric around zero. Sort by adjusted p, not by fold change: low-expression genes produce enormous ratios from noise.